Anyone who thinks there’s a better way to scale Bitcoin should convince the users, the nodes, the miners, the community, the network of such changes. If they are good changes they are then incorporated. Breaking into a hard fork is a pointless experiment that is doomed to failure; there can only be ONE Bitcoin, and the existence of little clones claiming to be better only serves to confuse normal people. Network effects keep Bitcoin on top, even without its vastly superior security and decentralization.

I’m not sure if you are a paid shill or what, but your listed criticisms are pretty weak.